” Nearly” as satisfying as the Supreme Court’s 5-4 choice to obstruct New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order limiting the size of religious gatherings– seemingly to fight against the spread of COVID– has been enjoying the predictable apoplectic meltdown on the Left.
Moreover, the pleasure is made additional unique by knowing that they understand SCOTUS may well not have even taken up the case– simply as it declined to do in 2 comparable cases earlier this year– if Amy Coney Barrett were not on the Court to cast the tie-breaker.
And best of all is understanding that the Democrat Celebration and its dancing monkeys in the liberal media know damn well Wednesday’s SCOTUS choice was a precursor of things to come.
That understanding is twofold.
First, Barrett’s confirmation solidified a conservative majority on the Court, made more important on Wednesday when Chief Justice John Roberts once again showed his true colors by sidling up alongside the 3 liberal justices and casting with his lot with them.
2nd, the knowledge that regardless of the result of the 2020 governmental election, Donald Trump’s tradition is not just secured; it was manifested on Wednesday night.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York accused the U.S. Supreme Court of political partisanship after it rejected his coronavirus restrictions on religious services. He recommended the 5-to-4 decision was a reflection of the court’s new conservative majority. https://t.co/CwuJfvuEsu
— The New York City Times (@nytimes) November 26, 2020
Let the hyperbolic histrionics begin!
Within minutes of news of the SCOTUS ruling breaking, Leftists cranked up their typical level of hysteria to full-blast crazy-train, as “Amy Covid Barrett” started to trend on social media. As reported by our good friends at Twitchy, smug blue-checkmark Twitter users led the clown automobile parade out of eviction.
Singer Deren Ney was just one numerous to play the “Amy Covid Barrett” card, no doubt believing it was smart– and ravaging.
Impeach Amy Covid Barrett
— Deren Ney (@DerenNey) November 26, 2020
Screenwriter Randi Mayem Vocalist pledged to call ACB “Amy Covid Barrett” for the rest of her( miserable) life; as if the Hollywood lefty would not develop an even “much better” nickname for Barrett, sooner or later.
I guarantee I will call her Amy Covid Barrett for the rest of her unqualified zealot hack judge life.
— Randi Mayem Singer (@rmayemsinger) November 26, 2020
Author Ali A. Rizvi opted for a ridiculous “death” tweet. (Pay no attention to Laurence Tribe’s drivel; he was lying and he knew it.)
Amy Covid Barrett literally eliminating it at SCOTUS https://t.co/6EDgf3frOZ pic.twitter.com/kNmUZtxGNJ
— Ali A. Rizvi (@aliamjadrizvi) November 26, 2020
This “developer of animation” didn’t know whether to laugh about the ridiculous label or weep about the “thousands and thousands” of more sure deaths that ACB “just handed us.”
I want to laugh that Amy Covid Barrett is trending however can’t stop thinking about the thousands and thousands more deaths she just handed us.
— Q. Allan Brocka (@allanbrocka) November 26, 2020
ARTIST AND WRITER TONY POSNANSKI WAS OBVIOUSLY SO UPSET THAT HE DECIDED TO GO ALL-CAPS SIMPLY TO ENSURE EVERYONE UNDERSTOOD IT.
DELIGHTED THANKSGIVING TO EVERYONE OTHER THAN THE GOP, SUPER SPREADERS, AND JUDGE AMY COVID BARRETT.
— Tony Posnanski (@tonyposnanski) November 26, 2020
Elsewhere, The Most Trusted Name in News ™ trotted out a physician to knock the judgment as an “definitely crazy” decision that “devalues human lives.” Dr. Peter Hotez said, after being cued up by CNN fill-in host Boris Sanchez:
” Yeah, it’s definitely crazy. This is not about spiritual flexibility; this is not about civil liberties; this is about all hands on deck to conserve lives over the next couple of months up until we get everyone immunized. […] I can say with firmness and clarity that human life is not cheap.
” And that Supreme Court judgment did just that– it devalues human lives and makes it really hard for our health care providers to provide the very best care possible to lower mortality rates.”
Sanchez “forgot” to ask Hotez if he although believed months of “peaceful protests” decreased the value of human lives. Or possibly Sanchez simply thought those lives were “inexpensive.” [sarc]
While we’re at it, I wonder if the good doctor believes abortion– or as Biden calls it, “ an important healthcare service“– “devalues human life.”
Former Obama stooge Ben Rhodes– Rhodes is still a stooge; he just doesn’t work for Chicago Jesus Barrack Obama, any longer– busted out the I-word– “illegitimate”– the Left’s favorite word over the last four years.
The brand-new illegitimate 5-4 SCOTUS majority overturning a policy to put more lives in risk. https://t.co/i8zzrqB6Vr
— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) November 26, 2020
Makes best “sense,” right? Illegitimate president begets illegitimate Supreme Court Justice begets invalid Supreme Court decision.
Even the “victim” of the SCOTUS judgment himself lashed out at the Court’s choice; then again, noted “Management” specialist Andrew Cuomo constantly blasts those who right his wrongs.
” We understand who he appointed to the Court and we know their ideology,” Cuomo said calling the choice “unimportant” and “moot.”
” The Supreme Court made a judgment. It’s more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else.
” It’s unimportant of any useful impact since of the zone they were talking about is moot. It expired last week,” the guv said, including, “It doesn’t have any practical effect.
” The claim was about the Brooklyn zone. The Brooklyn zone no longer exists as a red zone.
” Practical effect” aside, Cuomo was lying. Lying in the sense that he knows full well that the SCOTUS judgment develops precedent, and that the next time he gets a wild hair up his considers going all Andrew Cuomo with a similar order he might initially reconsider.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo reacts to Supreme Court obstructing constraints on houses of worship: “We know who he designated to the court, we understand their ideology.” pic.twitter.com/XJhp96 LBfK
— The Hill (@thehill) November 27, 2020
The bottom line:
First, success for the First Modification and spiritual liberty in the U.S. Supreme Court. Then, the enjoyable knowledge that the Left not just lost its collective crap over this choice; however that it likewise knows complete well that the choice was a precursor of things to come– enabled by a solidified conservative majority on Court.
And best of all, Donald Trump “did that.” (That was for you, Chicago Jesus Barack Obama.)
And the Democrats can’t do a damn aspect of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment